However, with the proliferation of administrative functions at the state level, intergovernmental pacts are extended to the rules and procedures for managing activities between them.  The Council of State Governments recommends the use of an intergovernmental authority to “ensure accountability, training, compliance, enforcement, regulation, information collection and exchange, as well as all staff, in order to make the [compact] a success.”  Since pacts are written in the form of contracts, states that negotiate pacts involving the creation of an intergovernmental agency are free to determine the rules applicable to the management of that agency. The treaties between states that were ratified after American independence in 1776, until the ratification of the present U.S. Constitution in 1789, according to the articles of confederation, are treated as intergovernmental pacts. These include agreements such as the Beaufort Treaty, which established the georgia-South Carolina border in 1787 and is still in force. In the United States, an intergovernmental pact is a pact or agreement between two or more states or between states and a foreign government. The compact clause (Article I, Section 10, Clause 3) of the United States Constitution provides that “no state ,… Agreements or pacts with another state or a foreign power,…” Pacts that require ongoing or future activities may provide one or more mechanisms for the acquisition of funds to finance these activities. Sources of funding under an intergovernmental pact may include the following means: while intergovernmental pacts historically have only state-owned states as parties, the federal government has recently participated in some pacts.  Indeed, some Pacts require a representative of the federal government to participate in compact governance. For example, the Woodrow Wilson Bridge and the Compact Tunnel require that a member of the 13-member board of directors governing the pact be appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, as noted above.  Some pacts have been implemented by Congress under federal law and provide for direct federal involvement in matters involved in the pact, such as the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, which applies to the transfer of prisoners convicted of independent trials.
Internal rules governing the management of activities under an intergovernmental pact may include, for example, that the term “compact” is most often used for agreements between states or between nations on issues in which they have a common concern.  Buenger et al., supra note 2, at 237. The purposes can be developed according to two target groups: legislators from states that wish to enter the Covenant before their approval, and then those who will act under the Covenant, as well as all judicial procedures that may be called upon to interpret or enforce it. Id.  Id. to 238. Some compacts may include conditions specific to the theme of the pact and also provide for an intergovernmental agency to open other measures to support the pact`s objectives. Id. at 239. The Constitution does not set the date or form of congressional approval of intergovernmental pacts.  Although Congress generally approves the pacts before they are implemented by contracting states, Congress can also give its approval after the subject of the agreement could not be fully considered by then.  In addition, if congressional approval is generally explicit, it can also be inferred on the basis of the circumstances. Congress may submit its approval subject to the Covenant, which contains appropriate conditions that do not contragate constitutional restrictions.  If Congress approves a pact, Congress will not give up or reduce its constitutional powers.  After negotiation, intergovernmental pacts must be approved by legislators in your affiliated states.  A pact is approved by a state legislator in accordance with its procedure for enacting legislation and becomes the status of the state.  If approved by the legislature, the Governor of